Won’t Somebody Think of the Children? Why Big Tech’s ‘Tobacco Moment’ Isn’t What It Seems
This title could be clearer and more informative.Try out Clickbait Shieldfor free (5 uses left this month).
A US jury found Meta and Google liable for addictive platform design that harmed a young user, marking a shift from content-based to design-based liability. While this verdict is significant, the policy responses emerging globally — age verification laws in Australia, OS-level age APIs in California, and EU DSA enforcement — risk entrenching a more surveilled, centralized internet. These compliance regimes favor large platforms and disadvantage federated, FOSS, and community-run alternatives. The author argues the real solution isn't wrapping the same addictive machines in more surveillance, but redirecting resources toward community-run, open-source digital spaces for young people where institutions have a duty of care rather than a duty to shareholders.
Table of contents
From Bad Content to Bad Machines“Addiction” as Legal Story and Medical DisputeSafety as a Pretext for More SurveillanceRegulators Discover “Addictive Design” – But For Whom?The Missing Imagination: Community‑Run, Free and Open AlternativesBuilders, Regulators, and the Rest of UsSort: