VIPER and MVVM architectural patterns in SwiftUI share the same underlying components despite appearing different. Views and entities are equivalent in both patterns, data stores match controllers, interactors correspond to view models, presenters align with root views, and wireframes serve the same purpose as coordinators. The

14m read timeFrom matteomanferdini.com
Post cover image
Table of contents
FREE GUIDE - SwiftUI App Architecture: Design Patterns and Best PracticesTable of contentsArchitectural design patterns share the same components, even when they seem widely differentVIPER is a transposition for iOS development of the Clean ArchitectureFREE GUIDE - SwiftUI App Architecture: Design Patterns and Best PracticesThe parallels between MVVM and VIPER stem from the roles of their components, not their namesThe views and entity layers of MVVM and VIPER are equivalentFREE GUIDE - SwiftUI App Architecture: Design Patterns and Best PracticesVIPER’s data stores are equivalent to MVVM’s controllers and other SwiftUI environment objectsVIPER’s interactors implement an app screen’s business logic like MVVM’s view modelsFREE GUIDE - SwiftUI App Architecture: Design Patterns and Best PracticesVIPER’s presenters naturally occur in MVVM as root viewsVIPER handles navigation through separate wireframes, while MVVM uses a single coordinatorFREE GUIDE - SwiftUI App Architecture: Design Patterns and Best PracticesVIPER’s dependencies must be created and injected at launch timeConclusionsFREE GUIDE - SwiftUI App Architecture: Design Patterns and Best Practices

Sort: