You might have heard that Bun is not just a runtime, but also a bundler. So you might wonder:  Why do... Tagged with vite, bunjs, node, javascript.

TIL is a community-driven platform for sharing and discovering interesting facts, trivia, and insights on a wide range of topics. Through user submissions and comments, TIL offers insights into obscure facts, historical events, scientific discoveries, and cultural phenomena. Readers can learn something new every day and contribute their own knowledge to the community by sharing interesting tidbits and trivia.

This is Learning

Why use Vite when Bun is also a bundler? - Vite vs. Bun? Why is Vite still needed? Vite is great for bundling client-side apps, has API's that many developers love. Bun's HMR currently has at least one open issue, which is important for fast local development.

Why use Vite when Bun is also a bundler? - Vite vs. Bun

I think that bun will not replace Vite
Actually it’s possible run Vite with Bun.

Soon, every person on the planet will have their own personal bundler and framework…

I don’t think it will. as in upcoming years, we will see some Bundlers like Bun.js which will be faster then bun (for sure). or we can’t say if vite alone did that. so, let’s wait for happens next. The technological advancements will never stop so we can’t say anything 😅😂

I think Bun will surpass Vite eventually give it time. Where does this leave Webpack in the dust?

That was accurate thing to say. thanks