Who to blame? The AI, The Programmer, or The Prompt? by Makan Sepehrifar

This title could be clearer and more informative.Try out Clickbait Shieldfor free (5 uses left this month).

A conference talk structured as a mock trial examining who bears responsibility when AI coding tools are exploited. Three real CVEs are analyzed: a GitHub Copilot prompt injection via Camo image proxy (CVSS 9.6), an Ollama remote code execution via unauthenticated Docker APIs (CVSS 9.4), and an AWS MCP server shell injection. Each case involves audience voting on whether the AI developer, tool developer, or end user is at fault. The talk concludes with the concept of the 'mental model gap' — the disconnect between how developers perceive AI tools as safe productivity boosters versus how attackers see them as autonomous agents with broad access and weak trust boundaries. Key takeaways: prompt injection is a fundamental LLM vulnerability, tool providers often underestimate deployment misuse, and shared responsibility across the ecosystem is essential.

42m watch time

Sort: