unknown

Google's engineering practices emphasize that code reviewers should approve changes that improve overall code health, even if imperfect. The standard balances forward progress with quality, favoring continuous improvement over perfection. Reviewers should use technical facts over personal preferences, follow style guides, and seek consensus through discussion. Educational comments should be marked as non-blocking. The goal is maintaining and improving codebase health over time while enabling developer productivity.

The Standard of Code Review

Chris Bongers

To add “Nit:” to places where you think the code could be improved but doesn’t necessarily have to is really a great idea!

Agree with you…In summary, Code review is two way learning process for both developer and reviewer…
I had also share one of my experience :
<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-review-code-junior-developer-edition-sumonta-saha-mridul-boxac" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow">https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-review-code-junior-developer-edition-sumonta-saha-mridul-boxac</a>