The post discusses several unpopular opinions about the Go programming language, emphasizing that while Go is known for its simplicity, complex applications require proper design patterns to avoid becoming unmanageable. It argues against using certain conventional practices like relying solely on the standard library to learn Go, using optional patterns for configuration, and defaulting to the net/http package over specialized router libraries. It also highlights the challenges with project structuring and the use of generics and channels, suggesting that these should be applied contextually rather than dogmatically.
2 Comments
Sort: