Trunk-Based Development: Why Most Teams Think They Use It (But Don’t)
This title could be clearer and more informative.Try out Clickbait Shieldfor free (5 uses left this month).
Many teams claim to practice trunk-based development but actually run a slower hybrid of feature-branch workflows. Real trunk-based development requires merging to main multiple times daily, keeping PRs small (under ~300 lines), fast code reviews (hours not days), feature flags to safely merge incomplete work, and CI/CD pipelines under 10 minutes. Common failure points include oversized PRs, slow async reviews, fear of merging unfinished code, and missing feature flags. A real-world example shows that enforcing same-day mergeability, a 300-line PR soft limit, and feature flags reduced PR size by 40%, cut review time to hours, and increased merge frequency within three weeks.
Table of contents
The Illusion of Trunk-Based DevelopmentWhat Real Trunk-Based Development Actually RequiresWhere Most Teams BreakThe Missing Piece: Feature FlagsReal Example From PracticeThe Hidden Constraint: CI/CD SpeedWhy This Matters More in 2026How to Tell If You’re Actually Doing ItPractical Rules You Can Apply TomorrowClosing Thought2 Comments
Sort: