Monolith in Microservices, Chatty Microservices, Distributed Monolith, Over-Microservices, Single Responsibility Violation, Spaghetti Architecture, Distributed Data Inconsistency, Tight Coupling, Lack of Observability, and Ignoring the Human Cost.

Bit's platform is a collaborative development platform, offering insights into component-driven development, code sharing, and version control for modern software projects. Through articles, tutorials, and documentation, Bit offers insights into creating and managing reusable components across projects and teams. Developers can learn about component design, versioning strategies, and integration with popular frameworks to streamline development workflows and improve code quality.

Bits and Pieces

This post discusses common anti-patterns in microservices architecture and provides recommendations for avoiding them. It covers topics such as monolith in microservices, chatty microservices, distributed monolith, over-microservices, violating single responsibility, spaghetti architecture, distributed data inconsistency, tight coupling, lack of observability, and ignoring the human cost.

Top 10 Microservices Anti-Patterns

Monitor, Debug and Improve Your Entire Stack

5 Essentials for Modern Frontend Architecture

Building a Reusable Infinite Scroll Component With React

Getting Started with a Vue.js App in 2024

Building an End-To-End App In Under 5 Minutes

A Modern Approach for Angular Development

A shared db doesn’t make your app a monolith, just as having a separate db for your app doesn’t make it a microservice.
There’s nothing wrong with having 1 shared database for multiple microservices, it’s not an anti-pattern, it the running costs are cheaper and it’s easier to maintain.

This resonates well with me. Every problematic microservices implementation has multiple of these issues.

Very thoughtful. It is difficult to keep a balance in architecture.