NeoVim, despite its popularity, is criticized for failing to add significant value over Vim and detracting from essential Vi/m learning. The post argues that NeoVim's configuration changes, additional defaults, and altered features diverge from the core Unix philosophy and dilute the real benefits of using Vim. Moreover, criticisms include the removal of key features integral to Vim, resulting in a bloat that undermines performance and utility. While NeoVim offers options like multiple plugin support and better defaults, these are deemed unnecessary for those proficient in Vi/m.

8m read timeFrom rwx.gg
Post cover image
Table of contents
An Honest Question, But No — Hell No“Better Configuration”“Better Defaults”“Multiple API and Plugin Support”“Changed Features”“Missing Legacy Features”“Removed Features”“More Accessible Team”“External Plugins in Separate Process”“Better Support for Alacritty”“Gives Vim Healthy Competition”“It Has Panes”Bugs? Stability?Dude, why so harsh on NeoVim?See Also
6 Comments

Sort: