A Series B company with 75 engineers rejects 90% of qualified candidates. Trial-based hiring produces 71% more successful hires per candidate while costing $30M less annually. The economics of hiring false negatives.

CodeGood

Traditional technical interviews systematically reject 90% of qualified engineers who would succeed on the job. A Series B company tracked rejected candidates for 18 months and found that interview performance correlates weakly (0.26-0.51) with actual job performance. By switching to trial-based hiring with 90-day evaluations, the company achieved 71% more successful hires per candidate, reduced time-to-hire by 63%, and generated $17.9M more annual value despite a slight increase in bad hires. The false negative cost of rejecting good engineers ($25M annually) far exceeds the cost of occasional bad hires ($5.1M), yet most companies maintain interview processes optimized for preventing false positives rather than measuring actual work capability.

The Engineer You Never Met: Why Interview Processes Systematically Reject Qualified Engineers, CodeGood