Part two of a series testing MotherDuck MCP server for natural language data analysis. The authors explore hallucination edge cases, the impact of DuckDB table/column annotations, and three prompting strategies (verbose, minimal, iterative) on query accuracy. Key findings: annotations expand the agent's exploratory scope rather than dramatically improving accuracy; prompt complexity matters less than expected; non-annotated datasets cause the agent to miss less obvious columns; and ad-hoc analysis requiring deep schema knowledge remains error-prone without explicit annotations and result verification.

8m read timeFrom codecentric.de
Post cover image
Table of contents
Finding Edge Cases and Forcing HallucinationsTesting with Annotated DataExhaustive Prompting vs. Iterative ConversationConclusion

Sort: