Just saw that Supabase crossed 100k on Github, which puts it among the top 100 most starred repos. That’s pretty wild.
I’ve been using Supabase for a while now, and it’s honestly become a default choice in my stack for a lot of projects.
What I personally like about it:
<ul>
<li>It really feels like a complete backend. You get auth, storage, realtime, edge functions, logs… all in one place without having to stitch together 5 different services.</li>
<li>It’s built on modern but solid tech. Under the hood, it’s mostly stuff we already trust (Postgres, PostgREST, etc.), just packaged in a way that actually makes sense.</li>
<li>The dev experience is probably what sold me the most. Running everything locally is super easy, and if it works locally, it almost always works in prod too. The CLI is clean, the JS client is intuitive, and the Studio UI is surprisingly polished.</li>
<li>Docs are generally solid too (even if some newer features feel a little under-documented sometimes lol).</li>
<li>Also: the free tier is generous enough to build and ship real things without immediately worrying about costs.</li>
</ul>
Excited to keep using it and see where it goes. What do you guys like about Supabase?

This squad was created to support resource sharing within the Fullstack Developer community. Developers can post anything related to software development.

Fullstack Developer

Supabase has crossed 100k GitHub stars, placing it among the top 100 most starred repositories. The author shares why Supabase has become a default stack choice: it provides a complete backend with auth, storage, realtime, edge functions, and logs in one place, built on trusted tech like Postgres and PostgREST. The developer experience is highlighted as a key selling point, including easy local development, a clean CLI, intuitive JS client, polished Studio UI, and a generous free tier.

Supabase just hit 100k stars on Github