Current observability tools were designed before AI-generated code became the norm, and they're failing to support AI-assisted debugging. The core problem is a data quality issue: teams collect massive volumes of generic telemetry via OpenTelemetry but lack the correlated, session-level context AI agents actually need. Key gaps include sampled/dropped traces, missing request/response payloads, redacted headers, and fragmented frontend/backend data across siloed tools. Three approaches are evaluated: smart filtering at the collector layer, AI agents embedded in observability platforms, and session-based on-demand collection. The third approach — capturing everything for a specific user session, already correlated, with full payloads — is presented as the most promising path forward. The argument is clear: AI debugging has a data problem, not a model problem, and smarter models won't fix bad observability data.

11m read timeFrom leaddev.com
Post cover image
Table of contents
Your inbox, upgraded.Where the process breaks downMore like thisWhat needs to change?AI debugging has a data problem

Sort: