My thoughts on why Agentic Engineering is a better path than Vibe Coding, and the workflow I use to turn AI agents into a structured engineering process.

WendellAdriel's blog is a source of practical advice, personal development insights, and entrepreneurial strategies. Through blog posts, interviews, and personal anecdotes, WendellAdriel shares lessons learned from his own experiences and offers guidance on achieving personal and professional success. Readers can learn about goal setting, time management, and mindset shifts to overcome challenges and pursue their passions with purpose. Additionally, WendellAdriel provides resources, book recommendations, and productivity tools to empower readers to take control of their lives and create meaningful change.

W endell Adriel

A comparison of Vibe Coding versus Agentic Engineering, arguing that using AI agents without structure leads to technical debt and poor software quality. The author defines Agentic Engineering as embedding AI agents into a deliberate engineering workflow rather than using them for ad-hoc code generation. A 7-step workflow is presented using a subscription billing retry system as a concrete example: writing a REQS.md requirements file, generating an implementation plan with an agent, refining the plan over 2-3 rounds, executing with a clean-context agent, running an independent agent code review, doing a personal review, and finally committing and creating a PR. The core argument is that agents should amplify engineering discipline, not replace it.

My Take on Vibe Coding VS Agentic Engineering

Why We Should Follow Agentic Engineering Instead of Vibe Coding

My Agentic Engineering Workflow in Practice