Vladi Stevanovic

Community Picks is a section on daily.dev where our community members share the most interesting and valuable content they've discovered online. From insightful articles to handy tools, every post is a gem curated by our dedicated coomunity. To contribute to Community Picks, you need to have at least 250 reputation points, ensuring that only active and trusted members can share their finds.

Community Picks

Neglecting the minimum viable architecture (MVA) can lead to risks such as technical debt, reduced market competitiveness, and wasted time. Implementing MVAs involves avoiding mistakes like letting the architecture emerge, creating tactical prototypes, neglecting documentation, and over-architecting. Balancing speed and system design is crucial, and adopting an MVA approach can help achieve this by focusing on essential requirements, delaying design decisions, and using familiar technology.

Minimum viable architecture is the backbone of a successful product

Common mistakes in implementing minimum viable architectures

<p>Great article. I’ve seen all this far too many times. Starting the MVP with “whatever works, we will refactor” always ends with “we have a 2yo product that is already legacy”. No business in its emerging phase will allow for a large-scale refactoring, and this phase will last more than everyone thinks.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I am often guilty of going the opposite route of designing way too complex and performant products, which ends in long delivery. It eventually pays off, but I need to constantly check my decisions not to overblow everything.</p>
