is it really true that he advocates for freedom of expression? I don’t believe it

The RubyLA blog offers insights, tutorials, and community updates for Ruby developers in Los Angeles and beyond. Developers can explore Ruby language features, web development frameworks, and best practices for building Ruby applications. Additionally, the blog covers Ruby meetups, events, and job opportunities in the Los Angeles area, fostering collaboration and networking within the local Ruby community.

RUBYLAND

Mark Zuckerberg claims to advocate for freedom of expression, but this is questioned in the context of centralized social networks. An alternative presented is RSS, a technology from the roots of the internet that allows users to consume content directly from sources without third-party interference. The post explains how RSS works, highlights its benefits, and mentions various RSS readers, including a new reader app, Chaski. Despite a decline in RSS popularity, it's suggested as a viable solution for staying informed without the influence of big tech companies.

Mark Zuckerberg said: It’s time to go back to our roots and use RSS

I’m all for RSS but the idea that RSS is “from the roots of the internet” is a little funny. It is not THAT old of a technology.

Whenever someone says RSS I just remember Man Of Steel where Jenny says about the signal “It’s coming in on the RSS feeds”.
Fuckerberg can Zuck off.

RSS is a legitimately based technology.

RSS 2.0 could be revolutionized if applied not just to feeds, but subscriptions as well