Thumbnail image AI-Generated using ChatGPT.
If we’re being honest…
What’s the point of documenting your journey in coding and tech if the first reaction is, “This is AI-generated”?
That mindset shuts down conversation before it even starts.
Here’s the reality:
Some of us are learning in real time.
Some of us are experimenting with React, C++, HTML, JavaScript, AI tools, the list goes on.
Some of us are building, failing, rebuilding, and sharing the process openly.
Not everyone sharing knowledge is pretending to be a 20-year senior developer.
Constructive criticism? That’s valuable.
Pointing out flaws? That’s how we grow.
But defaulting to “this must be AI” without engaging the actual ideas? That doesn’t build a stronger dev community.
Senior developers learned in an era without AI tools. That’s respectable.
New developers are learning in an era with AI tools. That’s reality.
The tools changed. The effort didn’t.
So here’s the real question I want honest answers to:
Why do people automatically assume a newer coder’s post is AI-generated instead of just engaging with the ideas?
Is it writing style?
Is it depth?
Is it bias against AI-assisted workflows?
Or something else?
If we want stronger developers, we need stronger conversations not automatic dismissal.
I’m genuinely asking. Let’s talk about it.

This squad was established to be able to share anything about development. Post, Comment, and Upvote!

Dev World

The author challenges the developer community's tendency to dismiss newer developers' content as AI-generated rather than engaging with the ideas presented. They argue that learning with AI tools is the current reality for new developers, just as senior developers learned without them. The piece calls for constructive criticism and genuine conversation instead of automatic dismissal based on assumptions about AI usage.

If You Disagree, Let’s Talk, But Stop Defaulting to ‘AI-Generated’