Technical debt (TD) is often viewed as a liability, but it can be leveraged to facilitate learning and avoid over-investment. Using a Minimum Viable Architecture (MVA) approach allows teams to make informed decisions about addressing TD by focusing on what is necessary for the success of a Minimum Viable Product (MVP). Not all perceived TD needs to be resolved, as some may turn out to be non-issues. Understanding how to appropriately manage TD helps teams effectively balance short-term delivery goals with long-term viability.
Table of contents
Without technical debt, nothing would get builtIncurring Technical Debt is a risk-management trade-offTechnical debt can be an illusionWhether TD needs to be tackled depends upon the MVP & MVAConclusionAbout the Authors2 Comments
Sort: