How Four Teams Stopped Postponing the Refactoring They Knew They Needed

This title could be clearer and more informative.Try out Clickbait Shieldfor free (5 uses left this month).

Four engineering teams — Wiz, IT Manufactory, NutriAdmin, and SEOBUK PRESENT — share how they overcame the rational tendency to defer refactoring. The core insight is that refactoring gets postponed not due to lack of awareness but because the short-term disruption risk outweighs perceived benefits. Each team changed that calculation by adopting JetBrains IDEs (GoLand, IntelliJ IDEA, WebStorm, Rider) that provide full codebase impact previews before committing changes and single-operation reversals. Wiz used GoLand on a million-line Go monorepo, IT Manufactory tackled cross-stack Java/React changes, NutriAdmin migrated from AngularJS while continuing to ship, and SEOBUK PRESENT managed tightly coupled hardware-software C# systems. The common thread: pre-change visibility and safe rollback reduced the cost of refactoring enough to make it a routine activity rather than a deferred risk.

8m read timeFrom blog.jetbrains.com
Post cover image
Table of contents
To refactor or not: The cost of a rational decisionWiz: Keeping a million-line monorepo changeableIT Manufactory: From manual verification to confident cross-stack changesNutriAdmin: Keeping a lean team shipping during a framework migrationSEOBUK PRESENT: Keeping a hardware-software platform changeable as it scalesThe refactoring calculation looks different from here

Sort: