Employee performance is likely Pareto-distributed rather than Gaussian, which highlights flaws in traditional performance management processes. The Pareto assumption suggests there is no statistical basis for annually firing the bottom 10% of the workforce, as low performers are more common and hiring errors should be treated
Table of contents
A different Perspective: ParetoImplicationsThings that are missingConclusions and OutlookBonus Content #1: Is there any data to support this Pareto idea?Bonus Content #2: Regarding the practice of “rolling up”Endnotes6 Comments
Sort: