Gemini 3.1 is really good, and also really bad. It's weird...

Thank you Kernel for sponsoring! Check them out at: https://soydev.link/kernel

Want to sponsor a video? Learn more here: https://soydev.link/sponsor-me

Check out my Twitch, Twitter, Discord more at https://t3.gg

S/O @Ph4seon3 for the awesome edit 🙏

T3Dotgg's resource offers insights, tutorials, and resources for gamers and esports enthusiasts. Readers can learn about gaming news, esports events, and professional gaming strategies. With articles, reviews, and interviews, T3Dotgg provides  guidance and expertise for staying informed and competitive in the world of gaming.

Theo - t3․gg

Gemini 3.1 Pro achieves top benchmark scores across multiple evaluations — including a 78% on ARC AGI 2, near-perfect Convex scores, and 100% on a custom skateboarding spatial reasoning benchmark — at roughly half the cost of competing models like Opus 4.6. However, despite its raw intelligence and knowledge depth, the model is plagued by serious practical issues: unreliable tool calling, looping behavior, hallucinated packages, poor agentic task completion, and a deeply buggy official CLI that randomly switches to other models. The author contrasts Gemini's benchmark dominance with Anthropic's focus on consistent, reliable tool use (even in smaller models like Haiku), arguing Google is 'benchmaxing' at the expense of real-world usability. The conclusion: Gemini 3.1 Pro is the smartest model available but one of the least pleasant to actually use for coding and agentic workflows.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is the smartest model ever made