In my Prompt Engineering 101 session, I have the last slide with the open questions about its future:
<ul>
<li>Will it become a separate job title or just an essential skill for many workers?</li>
<li>Will it become simpler (with tooling, more intuitive models) or more complex (multi-modality, vectors, etc.)?</li>
<li>Is there a trend for its democratizing (thus job title inflation, like “everyone is a prompt engineer now”) or gating because of growing complexity?</li>
<li>Who will benefit the most: linguists or technologists (or domain experts able to formulate the problem)?</li>
<li>Can we compete with “LLM Prompt Engineers”?</li>
</ul>
What do you think on these topics?

Prompt engineering is a cutting-edge discipline that focuses on harnessing the full potential of language models by strategically designing input instructions ("prompts")

Prompt Engineering

Key questions surrounding the future of prompt engineering include whether it will emerge as a standalone job title or remain an essential skill for many, whether it will become simpler or more complex, and who will benefit most from its rise: linguists, technologists, or domain experts. There's also a debate on whether the field will see democratization or job title inflation and how it compares to 'LLM Prompt Engineers'.

Future of the Prompt Engineering

I don’t think that will be a seperate job title. Since finetuning the prompt depend on the technical knowladge you have on that specific area. And yes it will be simpler and more efficient with the time as same as every other thing