Predictive algorithms in liver transplantation in the UK are scrutinized for biases, particularly against younger patients. The algorithm, which calculates a Transplant Benefit Score based on a five-year survival prediction, inadvertently prioritizes older patients. A Financial Times investigation highlights the ethical and technical flaws in this system. Despite public and professional concerns, challenging transparency and public participation in refining these algorithms remain significant issues.
Table of contents
How the liver allocation algorithm worksWhy is predictive AI even needed?The Financial Times investigationPatient groups warned about the biasShow us the target variable and we’ll show you the problemIt gets worseAn algorithmic absurdity: cancer improves survivalSleepwalking into utilitarian ethicsWhat’s nextSort: