CSV Files: Dethroning Parquet as the Ultimate Storage File Format — or Not?

This title could be clearer and more informative.Try out Clickbait Shieldfor free (5 uses left this month).

Data storage formats like CSV and Parquet serve different purposes in data analytics. CSV files are human-readable and easy to use but are inefficient and hard to parallelize. Parquet files, on the other hand, are highly efficient due to their columnar storage, compression techniques, and well-defined schema, making them better suited for data analysis. DuckDB has recently improved its CSV reader, making it more efficient and easier to use, but Parquet still holds a performance edge, especially in terms of query execution. The article concludes that while CSV files have their place for flexibility, Parquet files remain superior for most analytical tasks.

12m read timeFrom duckdb.org
Post cover image
Table of contents
File FormatsReading CSV Files in DuckDBComparing CSV and ParquetConclusion
2 Comments

Sort: