Evaluating large language models requires a combination of quantitative metrics (like BLEU, ROUGE, perplexity) and qualitative assessments through human judgment. Effective evaluation relies on three components: metrics, high-quality datasets, and structured frameworks. Methods include reference-based metrics that compare outputs to correct answers, reference-free metrics that assess intrinsic text quality, and LLM-as-a-Judge techniques. Key challenges include domain-specific relevance, handling correct but non-standard responses, and evaluating few-shot/zero-shot learning capabilities. Databricks introduced Mosaic AI Agent Framework to address enterprise-scale evaluation needs for complex AI systems like agents and RAG pipelines, providing tools for quality, cost, and latency assessment from development through production.
Table of contents
Understanding LLM EvaluationExploring LLM Evaluation MetricsBest Practices for LLM EvaluationSort: