Architectural retrospectives differ from reviews by focusing on evaluating the decision-making processes of the development team rather than the architecture itself. These retrospectives aim to improve the team's architecting skills and decision-making effectiveness, avoiding blame and instead identifying systemic biases and areas for skill improvement. Regular retrospectives can lead to better architectural decisions and are essential for continual process improvement in agile environments.
Table of contents
Architecture retrospectives are different from architecture reviewsRetrospectives should be separate from reviewsQuestions to ask in your retrospectivesHow frequently should a team retrospect?ConclusionAbout the AuthorsSort: