Peter Steinberger 🦞

A developer shares frustration after Google banned their account or project related to a tool called Antigravity, contrasting Google's abrupt enforcement approach with Anthropic's reportedly more communicative and developer-friendly handling of policy issues. The developer is considering dropping Google support from their project.

Pretty draconian from Google. Be careful out there if you use Antigravity. I guess I'll remove support. 

Even Anthropic pings me and is nice about issues. Google just... bans? https://t.co/JBq9YCB7nB

<p>Pretty draconian from Google. Be careful out there if you use Antigravity. I guess I'll remove support. 

Even Anthropic pings me and is nice about issues. Google just... bans? https://t.co/JBq9YCB7nB</p>

TestingCatalog News 🗞

A chain of events unfolded involving Antigravity and OpenClaw: Antigravity users experienced degraded performance, Google identified malicious usage of Antigravity's backend services and banned associated accounts, and it emerged that many affected users had connected Gemini models through OpenClaw's OAuth integration. In response, OpenClaw developer Peter Steinberger announced plans to remove Gemini OAuth support from the app.

Antigravity vs OpenClaw?

A series of events: 
- Antigravity users faced degraded performance 
- Google discovered malicious usage of Antigravity backend services
- Google banned user accounts relying on these methods 
- It turned out that many affected users connected Gemini models via OpenClaw OAuth. 
- Peter Steinberger plans to remove Gemini OAuth support from OpenClaw

AI week has begun 🍿

<p>Antigravity vs OpenClaw?

A series of events: 
- Antigravity users faced degraded performance 
- Google discovered malicious usage of Antigravity backend services
- Google banned user accounts relying on these methods 
- It turned out that many affected users connected Gemini models via OpenClaw OAuth. 
- Peter Steinberger plans to remove Gemini OAuth support from OpenClaw

AI week has begun 🍿</p>