LLM evaluation (evals) is essential for measuring model performance but challenging due to probabilistic outputs and subjective language quality. The guide covers three evaluation types: automatic (exact matching, semantic similarity, model-based judging), human (preference ranking, Likert scales), and benchmark-based (MMLU, HumanEval). Key concepts include choosing appropriate metrics, building quality test datasets, and accounting for statistical variance. A practical eval process involves defining success criteria, creating 50-100 diverse test cases, choosing evaluation approaches, iterating on improvements, and tracking performance over time. Common pitfalls include overfitting to eval sets, gaming metrics, and neglecting edge cases.

11m read timeFrom blog.bytebytego.com
Post cover image
Table of contents
The Developer's Guide to MCP Auth (Sponsored)The 2025 Data Streaming & AI Report (Sponsored)Why LLM Evaluation Is ChallengingTypes of LLM EvaluationsKey Concepts in LLM EvalsSetting Up Your Eval ProcessCommon Pitfalls and Best PracticesConclusionSPONSOR US

Sort: